When he is denied entry by the gatekeeper, the man languishes in indecision. Should he go further without permission? Are the other gatekeepers more fearsome as the first gatekeeper implied? The man then spends years contemplating and asking questions, when he would do better to act. If the law is what he truly wants, and not what is expected of him, he should pursue all avenues to attain it. Instead he lets propriety influence and conforms to society's norm. Now he should wait, now he should appease the gatekeeper who continually denies him even while accepting the man's bribes. The law is like the carrot that dangles just out of reach of the donkey, who ceaselessly trudges in circles turning the grindstone, ever thinking that just one more step will bring him closer to the prize.
Finally, at the end of his life, with his last dying gasp he notices an illumination emanating from the gate as the darkness comes for him. The illumination doesn't come from the law, which, according to the first gatekeeper, is well past other gates. The illumination is free will and the will to act. To take that one step past the gate; then more steps through more gates, through however many gates it is necessary. A man's inaction define him as much as his action. In the final moment the gatekeeper shares a final revelation: the gate was meant for man, and only he could pass it. All the man had to do was walk through it.
In the game Before the Law, the player is given the option ignore the gatekeeper and press on through the gate. As the man from the country trudges forward, the world around him falls and shudders away, as it no longer has any importance, or existence, to the man. The man's sole focus is the law, to obtain it like a possession. And in obtaining it defines himself by it. The law will help make him and his life better, in his eyes and in the eyes of his contemporaries. At the end of a path suspended in space, with nothing all around him, the man reaches the law in the form of a book. But the book is empty, much like his motivation for obtaining it. The man was not true to himself; chasing, like everyone else, after an object or idea. The man might have fared better fighting against expectations, and instead sought that which defines himself: his own personal choice.
Good, but next time link the games more specifically to the theorist.
ReplyDelete-Ms Bommarito